In Shakespeare's Hamlet, the character Hamlet is a tragic hero. He has a task to do, but a personality flaw gets in the way. Although he ultimately succeeds in avenging his father's death and cleansing Denmark of the evil, his waiting so long to do it causes a blood bath. Other people besides Claudius (the guilty party) die needlessly. This makes Hamlet, by definition, a tragic hero.
Your question, however, contains a number of layers. Hamlet is probably not an anti-hero in our modern sense, if that's what you mean by a "non hero." He isn't a good-hearted rogue, or an extremely flawed figure who just happens to do something heroic.
But is he a hero, in any sense other than as a tragic figure? He is brave and fearless at times, he is intelligent, he can be good hearted though he is merciless to those who betray him, he is deeply loyal to his father, and he is an excellent swordsman. He is good, if that's important to your definition of a hero.
In his environment and in his role, he is probably a great hero. He is royalty, and he avenges a king's murder. He is also, Claudius says, beloved of the Danish people.
I'll leave the conclusions to you.
No comments:
Post a Comment