Sunday, January 31, 2016

What is ironic about Huck wishing Tom were there to help plan the escape? How do you think the plan would have developed had Tom been there?...

Huck's wishing for Tom to help him escape is ironic because when Tom is around to help Jim "escape" at the novel's end, he unnecessarily prolongs Jim's captivity to implement his Romantic plotline. When Huck is trying to escape from Pap at the beginning of the novel, he longs for Tom's "fancy touches" for his escape, but Huck escapes flawlessly and practically from Pap because of his pragmatic intellect. 


If Tom had been there, he most likely would have asked Huck to allow him some time to come up with his escape plan and then would have developed an elaborate story to accompany his plan, which would have made it ineffective and would have put Huck in even more danger from Pap.


Twain characterizes the two boys in this manner because Huck is Twain's voice--the voice of the Realist, someone who is practical and usually logical in his thinking. In contrast, Tom represents the Romantics for whom Twain held so much contempt.  He believed that Romantic authors drew out their writing unnecessarily by adding unrealistic elements and too many flowery descriptions. Philosophically, any plan that Tom develops cannot be successful because Twain would be admitting that the Romantics trump him and his own philosophy of writing.

The Grange, the Heights and Penistone Crags-how do these localities help reveal the ideas of Wuthering Heights?

Wuthering Heights is associated with the Earnshaws and the passionate Catherine and Heathcliff. Thrushcross Grange is the home of the refined and socially superior Lintons. The contrast with the neighbouring house, even though they are separated by only four miles, could not be greater. The vegetation is lush and beautiful and  sheltered by the Grange's position. It is  tucked away on lower ground.


The Grange is not as perfect as it may seem on the surface. Edgar and Isabella Linton are spoilt, silly  and greatly concerned with superficial matters such as appearance. It is Catherine's great misfortune that she finds herself torn between her love for Heathcliff and her desire for the wealth and social position that goes with the position of lady of the house at Thrushcross Grange.


The Grange is also a place of boundaries and restrictions, surrounded by a high wall. When Catherine lies ill in bed at the Grange, all she wants is to return to her old home:



 "Oh, dear! I thought I was at home," she sighed. "I thought I was lying in my chamber at Wuthering Heights." (Chapter 12)



and her daughter Cathy is forbidden to go beyond the boundary walls. If the residents of Wuthering Heights find themselves exposed, those of the Grange are overly sheltered from the realities of life.


The one place where characters are free to be themselves is out on the moors- Penistone Crags. This location is predominantly associated with Catherine and Heathcliff; young Cathy also shows her affinity with her mother through her yearning to escape the confinement of the Grange and run free on the moors. The imagery of these wild, rolling moors runs throughout the novel, finding perhaps its most famous expression in Catherine's metaphorical description of her love:



 My love for Heathcliff resembles the eternal rocks beneath: a source of little visible delight, but necessary. Nelly, I am Heathcliff.


Should there be more laws protecting citizens or should there be fewer, and should all groups have equal rights?

The question raises two issues. Taking up firs the easier one of the two issues, I believe that all groups should have equal right.


The question of how many laws are appropriate to protect citizens is not that easy to answer. Increasing the number of laws apparently provides protection to to citizens in more areas. However, while laws, protect the interest of citizens, they also increase the scope for law enforcing agencies to interfere in lives for individuals. Let us take for example the laws relating to the responsibilities and obligation of parents towards their children. Such laws cover some basic responsibilities of the parents such as sending their children to school, ensuring their basic safety, and providing them with basic necessities like food, clothing and shelter. But children also require love and understanding from their parents, and some parents may fall short of the ideal levels of love and understanding. But if laws were to be enacted covering such aspects also. it would give too much power to law enforcing agencies to interfere in private family life of people.


Thus under a given condition of society, there is an optimum level of extent of legal provision to regulate conduct of individuals, institutions and others. Increasing laws beyond the optimum level increases the problems of implementing the law, which can more than offset the befits of improved protection provided by the law.


Also very important is the quality of law. One good law can do more good than several ordinary ones. Not only that, a bad law can actually do more harm than good.

Why does the adult Scout begin her narrative with Jem's broken arm and a brief family history?

In the book "To Kill a Mockingbird" Scout has grown and matured and wants to bring the reader to the events of the year that had changed her life and had matured Jem and her.  She begins the story by telling about Jem's arm so that the reader will have an understanding of the children's ages, the kind of person Jem is, and her relationship with her brother.


The background of the town and the interaction of the people as well as how Scout first viewed her own is also central to the theme of change.  The reader believes that it is a nice quiet and comfortable sleepy little town.  However, as Scout matures through the events of Tom Robinson's trial, the reader and Scout begin to see the ugliness that lies beneath in the behavior and prejudice of the townspeople.

Saturday, January 30, 2016

As we see the reactions of Tituba to the questioning of Hale, how can individuals react and respond when in conflict and desperate?The Crucible

If we look at the way Tituba reacts to being questioned (actually, it's more in response to being threatened) we can see that people will say whatever they think is most likely to save their lives.


Tituba does not really think she has done anything wrong.  We can see that by how she appears pretty calm at first.  But then when they start talking about hanging her, she changes.


She starts to say things she does not really believe.  She says that someone else is witching the girls, and she starts to name names.


So this shows that when people are desperate, they are likely to lie to save themselves.

What role did Lady Macbeth play in the play "Macbeth?" Like what was her purpose,you know??

The witches, through trickery and equivocation, plant the seeds of murder, and Lady Macbeth waters the seeds that helps them grow.


She more than convinces her husband, Macbeth, to kill the sleeping King Duncan (through her own mischievous brand of innuendo and tongue-lashing trickery), she even makes it easy for him to do so. She drugs the King's guards, leaves the door to the King's room open, and then lets Macbeth know (by ringing her little bell) when everything is ready for the deed to be done.


Lady Macbeth is, in legal terms, an accessory to murder.


After the murder, her role, in addition to being a very dissatisfied Queen of Scotland, is to try to calm and soothe her ever-more-edgy and sleepless husband. As successful as she was in prodding Macbeth and helping him do the murder, she is as unsuccessful in assuaging her husband's paranoiac fear and guilt-ridden, murderous intentions.

Friday, January 29, 2016

In Fahrenheit 451 the entire backdrop of the first 30 pages has an impending war. Who do you think the war is between/among?Use two quotes to prove...

Throughout the entire book, there are hints at a possible war.  It is never part of the main conflict and storyline of Montag's evolving character and feelings, but rather a backdrop for the main action.  The first reference we get to a possible war is after Montag walks into his house and discovers Mildred has tried to kill herself.  As he stands there, Bradbury writes,



"the sky over the house screamed...the jet bombers going over, going over, going over, one two, one two, one two, six of them, nine of them, twelve of them."



There are a couple important things to note about this quote.  The first is that there are so many jet bombers, and Bradbury's repetition, describing them as always going over, seems to imply that war is a threat.  Why else would so many bombers be flying around all of the time?  Also, Montag is not surprised or startled at the bombers, which means that they were there quite often--it was a regular part of his life. This indicates that he was used to them, implying that they had been vamping up for war for quite some time.


As you keep reading, there are further hints given as to who the war might be between.  It is hinted that everyone else in the world hates America because of their high standard of living and lack of morals.  That suggests that America is at war with other nations in the world, for differences in ideologies, and because America has become a target for countries that are starving--they blame their hunger on us.  Characters in the novel itself will discuss the impact of the war on their personal lives.  I hope that those thoughts helped; good luck!

In A Midsummer Night's Dream, what are some examples of characters showing good intentions but ending up making the situation worse?

As befitting one of Shakespeare´s romantic comedies, this play is all about mistakes, confused identities, and problems becoming further complicated before they are resolved. The key example of one character who tries to help and resolve the problems in the play but laughably only succeeds in making things worse is Puck, who is ordered by his master, Oberon, King of the Fairies, to make Demetrius fall in love with Helena. Puck and Oberon have observed how much in love Helena is with Demetrius, but how he treats her, insulting her, threatening to abandon her and lastly threatening her with violence if she will not leave her alone. Oberon thus decides to reverse things and make Demetrius fall madly in love with Helena:



Fare thee well nymph, ere he do leave this grove,


Thou shalt fly him, and he shall seek thy love.



Of course, hilarious confusion results, when Puck, not knowing there are two Athenian couples in the woods, annoints the eyes of Lysander with the flower, and then Helena wakes him and Lysander suddenly is in love with Helena, completely forgetting Hermia. This situation is further complicated (as if it couldn´t get any worse) when Puck annoints the eye of Demetrius and then Helena is the first person he sees, resulting in a complete reversal of affections from the beginning of the play, when Hermia was loved by both males. Now, Helena is loved by both males and Hermia is rejected by them both. Of course, by the end of the play, Puck has resolved his mistake, separating the lovers and re-annointing their eyes, ensuring that they wake up with the right person.


Of course, all of this serves to highlight a central theme of the play - the fickleness of love, and we can´t help but laugh at characters who one minute swear their undying devotion to someone else, then next minute completely forget them. The last laugh seems to be with Shakespeare however, as through all of this he is mocking our fickleness and inconstancy and our ability to radically change our affections. By making us laugh at characters who do what we do, he makes the lesson much stronger.

In Chapter 7, what happens when Ralph wounds the boar?

When Ralph wounds the boar, he feels the excitement of hunting for the first time.  Up until this time, he has left the savagery of the hunt to Jack and his gang of hunters.  When Ralph throws his spear in a split second decision, he is elated by the feeling of the hunt and the victory of having hit the boar.  Unfortunately, Ralph only wounded the boar and it got away.  Because of this fact, he is still not accepted by the group of hunters.

What are some themes in Running with Scissors by Augusten Burroughs?I am struggling as the book seems to be all over the place, so themes are...

Many students have difficulty discovering the theme(s) of a work of literature, so you're not alone. I teach my students to ask a few questions after reading it, such as "What is the author saying about the main topic of the work?", or "Why do you think the author wrote this?". Try to find the message the author is giving us about life and people. In this case, the main character suffers horrific abuse and neglect from those people in his life he should have been able to trust. I think the author is talking about the strength of the human spirit and that it's possible to overcome even the most difficult of circumstances. Another possible theme might be that Dr. Finch is an example of what happens when a medical professional abuses his responsibilities to his patients and society.

How do I write a outline for an essay (Frey Tag Pyramid) I wrote on "For Whom the Bell Tolls"?

The Freytag Pyramid is the familiar plot outline for breaking a story into its parts.  I've included a link explaining it.  If you are being asked to write an outline to go along with a literary analysis, I would assume the outline would be to delineate the story, and not your essay.  In this case, use the pyramid shape to identify the setting, rising action, climax, etc.. of the story.

Thursday, January 28, 2016

Do you think Dally's parents have influenced the way he is?

There have been many papers written on nurture versus nature.  In Dally's case I believe it could have been a combination of both.  Dally, whose real name is Dallas Winston, is a Greaser who uses no grease in his hair.  He has blue eyes but they burn with a cold hatred towards the world.  He had spent three years of his life living in New York in the bad part of town.  He was arrested at the age of ten years.  He was the toughest and meanest of the Greasers.  The writer states that there was no line that separated Dally when it came to him being a Greaser or a hood.  In New York he had actually been a part of the real gangs.  Dally had a police record such as being arrested for being drunk, disorderly, lied, cheated, stole, rolled drunks, and jumped small kids. 


Dally probably developed his personality as the result of his environment at home and in his community.  He obviously did not have much supervision and the book states that Johnny was the only thing that he loved.  (page 152)


Dally loses it after Johnny dies which is a strong indicator that Dally really has lost the only person that he trusts and loves.  If Dally had a good relationship with his parents, where he felt safe and nurtured,  he may still have turned out problematic based on the environment he had lived in when he resided in New York, but he would also have gone to them when he was upset and not ended up causing his own demise.


Even though the book does not state anything about Dally's relationship with his parenst, he fits in with the Greasers who are boys that have to serve as family for one another.

Wednesday, January 27, 2016

What general statement is Knowles making about the "nature of friendship" and "true virtue"?

In my opinion, Knowles is trying to use this book to say that people need to be less selfish and insecure.  He is saying that these negative attributes cause conflict on the individual level and worldwide.


So, for him, true friendship would consist of appreciating another person's qualities without feeling jealous of those qualities.  This is where Gene falls short -- he is too jealous of Finny.


Similarly, true virtue would consist of accepting one's own good and bad points.  Virtuous people would, perhaps, try to improve on their bad points, but would not envy those who seem "better" than they are.

What is the summary of the poem Govinda's Disciple By Rabindranath Tagore

Rabindranath Tagore’s poem Govinda’s disciple is a moral fable that deals with the relation between Govinda and his disciple Raghunath. It is a subtle critique of materialism that goes by in the name of spiritual respect.



‘Govinda’s Disciple’ brings into focus the master-disciple relationship and shows us how the master teaches values through living examples of painful experiences. Govinda Singh, one of the founders of Sikh religion, sitting on a rock on the bank of river Jumna teaches his disciple Raghunath the importance of material renunciation to achieve divine life.



The disciple presents a pair of gold bangles to his master. The master is not pleased at his disciple’s gift. He wants to teach his foolish disciple that attachment to this metal is a serious impediment to divine blessing. A disciple who seeks divine life is expected to possess detachment from the material world. The master lets one of the bangles roll down into the river. The panic-stricken disciple jumps into the water to recover the lost bangle. The master spent the time reading scriptures. As the daylight faded, the disciple came up and begged his master to help him spot the direction where the bangle fell to make yet another attempt. To his shock, the master obliged him by throwing the other bangle to the same direction where the first one fell.



This is how he teaches a lesson to his disciple and makes him realize that he was only satisfying his ego and not showing real selfless regard for his guru. What is left unsaid is more eloquent and effective. The abrupt end gives the reader a powerful message.



I think that one can examine the imagery used to describe the bangles the first time the guru examines them when given by the student. An example of personification could be seen when the diamonds “darted shafts of light.” The implication here is that the diamonds have come to life, reflecting the severe love the student holds for the bangles, almost to value them more than anything else. When Tagore writes that “it slipped from his hand and rolled down the bank.”,  in this figure of speech, the idea of the object holding value is something that brings out how the student viewed the object, explaining why he was destined to lose it.

Please explain the quote from 1984: "We shall meet in the place where there is no darkness." Who is saying it? When did they say it? What is the...

As other educators have noted, this sentence appears in a dream to Winston and is uttered by O'Brien, a fellow party member. When it first appears, in Part One, Chapter Two, it represents Winston's internal desire to rebel against the party's control. But Winston's thoughts on this matter are suddenly interrupted by a "trumpet call" from the telescreen. This interruption forces Winston to abandon his thoughts and, on a deeper level, to realise that resistance against the party is futile. 


But, over time, Winston's sense of internal rebellion heightens to a point that he can no longer ignore it. In Part Two, Chapter Eight, for example, he goes to O'Brien's apartment and we hear the phrase repeated again. This is a critical moment for Winston because he has taken his internal rebellion to a new level: he has made himself known to O'Brien and is about to receive a copy of Goldstein's book. The fact that Winston is the one who utters this phrase is indicative of his optimism. Winston thinks that O'Brien has recognised "this allusion" but it is doubtful that he has. It is more likely that he played along to encourage Winston in his anti-party activities.


Ironically, O'Brien is not the man Winston believes him to be; he is a member of the Thought Police and "the place in which there is no darkness," is, in fact, the Ministry of Love, and is a symbol of Winston's torture and reintegration into society. Just like the party's ironic slogans, like War is Peace, irony is at the very heart of 1984 and defines the course of Winston's life. 

Tuesday, January 26, 2016

Atticus tells Jem that he can kill all the bluejays he wants but it's a sin to kill a mockingbird. What does this mean?the mockingbirds in the...

Atticus says this to Jem in chapter 10 when Jem gets a gun for the first time.  Like many young boys, Jem just wants to shoot whatever he can.  Atticus tells him he can shoot bluejays because they are considered a nuisance bird.  Bluejays make a raucous sound, they steal other birds' nests and drive away other birds, etc.  Mockingbirds, however, are not a nuisance bird.  Mockingbirds, according to Atticus, simply sing their hearts out for our entertainment.  The idea is that it is wrong to harm something - like a mockingbird - that does no harm and, in fact, actually does good.  This is one of the central themes of the book.  Boo Radley is like the mockingbird.  Boo does no harm to anyone with his odd ways and by the end of the story, has actually done a great deal of good by saving Jem and Scout from Bob Ewell.  The children, especially early in the story, delighted in playing games that mocked Boo Radley and made fun of him.  After Boo saves the children and Sheriff Tate realizes that Jem didn't kill Bob Ewell, but that Boo Radley did, Tate refuses to arrest Boo.  He says that it would be wrong to force him, with his shy ways, into the limelight that would ensue if people knew how heroic he'd been.  Scout, hearing this, tells her dad, who is concerned about the ethics and legality of it, that bringing attention to Boo would be like shooting a mockingbird.

How is Ophelia a tragic hero, what is her tragic flaw?Was she a strong enough person to be a tragic hero? Could the fact that she was a pushover be...

In Shakespeare’s play "Hamlet" Ophelia is destined to be doomed by her love for Hamlet.  She lives in a society that requires that she succumb to the demands placed on her by her father and her brothers.  She is always caught between her feelings for Hamlet and pressure from her brothers.  When her father is killed at the hands of Hamlet, Ophelia feels guilty and alone.  When Hamlet rejects her, she ends her life.  Even in death she is denied a Christian burial by a male priest.


Ophelia is a tragic figure but not a hero.  She simply loves too deeply a man that abuses her love and has been born at a time when men controlled the lives of women.

What is the meaning Of the cartoon in the Montgomery Advertiser that Scout doesn't understand?

This cartoon shows up in Chapter 12.  It shows Atticus as a little boy wearing shorts and no shoes.  He's chained to a desk and doing school work while some girls call to him.


The meaning of the cartoon is that Atticus is sort of a geek.  He is always working and is too serious.  As Jem says, it shows that Atticus does things that wouldn't get done otherwise, but the cartoon is making fun of Atticus for doing them.  The cartoon shows this because it has him chained to a desk working while the other kids are trying to get him to do something else.

Details on deaths for a Romeo and Juliet obituary?I have to do an obituary for the characters that died in R+J. Can any of these questions be...

I do not think we have all of that information for any of the characters.  We have full names for Romeo (Montague) and Juliet (Capulet).


We know that Juliet was 14 when she died because in Act I her dad tells Paris that she is too young to marry and he gives her age.  Both Romeo and Juliet lived in Verona, Italy at the time of their deaths.  They were married to each other and neither had been married before.


We do not know the first names of either of their parents.


For Romeo and Juliet, the cause of death was suicide.  He died by poison, she by stabbing herself with his dagger.

Monday, January 25, 2016

What evidence do we get of Happy sharing some Willy's less attractive qualities? In particular, lying and exaggeration?

Happy is also a womanizer. Here it is in his own words:



...You’re gonna call me a bastard when I tell you this. That girl Charlotte I was with tonight is engaged to bemarried in five weeks.


BIFF: No kiddin’!


HAPPY: Sure, the guy’s in line for the vice-presidency of the store. I don’t know what gets into me, maybe I just have an overdeveloped sense of competition or something, but I went and ruined her, and furthermore I can’t get rid of her. And he’s the third executive I’ve done that to. Isn’t that a crummy characteristic? And to top it all, I go to their weddings! (Indignantly,but laughing.) Like I’m not supposed to take bribes. Manufacturers offer me a hundred-dollar bill now and then to throw an order their way. You know how honest I am, but it’s like this girl, see. I hate myself for it. Because I don’t want the girl, and still, I take it and — I love it!



So, he knows what he is doing is base, but he does it anyway. He can't move up in his job, so he sleeps with executives' fiances. And he also manages to mention to Biff that he takes bribes.


Then, much later in the play, when Happy and Bilff are supposed to have this big dinner with their father, Happy seem far more interested in picking up women. He spots this lady, Miss Forsthythe and goes over to her. The first thing he says to her is a lie:




..excuse me, miss, do you mind? I sell champagne, and I’d like you to try my brand. Bring her a champagne, Stanley.



Then, when he introduces Biff to her, he lies and tells her that Biff is a quarterback for the New York Giants.


It's fitting and awful that Biff runs out of the restaurant and Happy follows him with the women they have picked up there, abandoning their cheating father who is babbling on the bathroom floor.. steeped in his memories of being caught with a woman by his favorite son.

Comment on the significance of the title of the play THE WAY OF THE WORLD by WILLIAM CONGREVE.

The meaning of the expression "the way of the world" literally means 'the way people behave or conduct themselves' in this world.  However, in the Restoration times which was notorious for its promiscuity and loose morals the expression "the way of the world" connoted adultery.


Adultery is the most important theme of Congreve's play "The Way of the World," and it is underscored by using that expression as the title of the play itself.


The expression "the way of the world" occurs thrice in the play:


Firstly, at the end of Act 3 Mrs. Marwood reveals to her lover Fainall the details of the conversation between his wife Mrs.Fainall and Foible which she overheard when she was hiding in Lady Wishfort's closet. Fainall becomes acquainted with the bitter truth that his friend Mirabell and his wife Mrs. Fainall had been former lovers and that Mirabell had got him married to Mrs.Fainall to use him as a shield in case Mrs. Fainall were to become pregnant. Fainall is shocked to learn of the betrayal of both his friend and his wife and expresses his resentment thus:



Fain: And I, it seems, am a husband, a rank-husband; and my wife a very errant, rank-wife,—all in the way of the world.



Secondly, in Act 5 Mincing the servant steps forward to testify that she and Foible had seen Mrs.Marwood and Fainall in a sexually compromising situation, at once Fainall very boldly remarks:



Fain: If it must all come out, why let ’em know it, ’tis but the way of the world.



Fainall defends himself saying that he couldn't care if he is exposed as an adulterer because he knows the truth that his wife is also an adulteress. Adultery, according to Fainall,  is too common a practice for anyone to complain about.


Thirdly, again in Act 5 Mirabell taunts Fainall by remarking,



Mira: Even so, sir, ’tis the way of the world, sir; of the widows of the world.



Mirabell snubs Fainall by revealing to him that his wife, a former widow, Mrs.Fainall who was actually his secret lover has been wise enough to trust him with her share of her property and that every thing had been recorded precisely in a legal document and that he had no rights over her property.


Mrs.Fainall even as she was committing adultery had been shrewd enough to protect her financial interests unlike her cuckolded husband Fainall.

A candlestick holder has a concave reflector behind the candle.The reflector magnifies a candle -0.75 times and forms an image 4.6 cm away from the...

We know that the real image in a concave reflector is small and inverted  when magnification is -0.75. The position of object for this should be away farther than the centre of curvature and the real invetred image lies between the focus and the centre of cuvature of the reflector. Also the focal length f , object distance u and image distance v from the concave reflector follow the rule:


1/f = 1/u + 1/v......................(1). Since the magnification m =-0.75, the real image is inverted and could be caught on a screen. 


The manification, m = v/u. Or 


v/u = 0.75 Or, u = v/0.75. Substituting this value of u in (1) we get:


1/f = 1/(v/0.75)+1/v = (1/v)(1.75). So ,


the focal length, f =  V/1.75 = 4.6/1.75 = 2.62857 cm.


U = u/0.75 = 4.6/0.75 =  6.13333 cm is the object distance from the concave reflector.

Sunday, January 24, 2016

What does Scout think of current practices in education?education

Scout absolutely hates the way her school is.  She hates the way the teachers teach.  In general, she thinks that they do not let her have enough challening material.  Instead, they want her to do the same sorts of rote learning drills that everyone else in the class does.  Because of this, she hates school -- both first and second grade.


In Chapter 2, for example, she hates the "Dewey Decimal System" of education where the teacher holds up cards and the kids are just supposed to look at them.

Can you describe the nature of Dunny's quest in Fifth Business?From the novel Fifth Business

Dunstan Ramsey spends a large amount of his life chasing after the stories of obscure saints in Europe.  For a man who is not even a Catholic, and who has an abhorrence of religion from his childhood experiences of Calvinism, the devotion of a life to this pursuit seems odd.  But Dunstan has several particular reasons for his interest in hagiography (the lives of saints).


When Dunstan was in the first World War, he was saved, he believes, by a vision of the Virgin Mary.  He was heralded as a hero, because he had performed a heroic act in which he almost certainly should have died.  He did lose a leg, and had withered arm his whole life afterwards, but he did survive; and he did not attribute this to luck, but to divine intervention.  That this didn't create in Dunstan a profound conversion to a faith is also somewhat odd -- he remains a kind of believer, but a questing, questioning one, rather than a churchgoer.


But before his war experience, Dunstan identified the woman who lived next door to him, Mary Dempster, as a saint.  She had been hit on the head with a snow-covered rock meant for Dunstan (then Dunstable).  Dunny dodged out of the way of the snowball thrown by Percy-Boyd Staunton, and it hit Mrs. Dempster.  Forever after Dunstan bears the guilt of this -- even though, by most people's standards, Percy-Boyd (to become Boy) was far more to blame than Dunstan was.  Mrs. Dempster, as a consequence of the hit on the head, gives  birth to her baby prematurely, and is never right in the head again.  She eventually becomes very mad, indeed, but Dunstan attributes at least three miracles to her (including the raising of Dunstan's brother from the dead).  Dunstan feels extreme guilt, especially, for the baby Paul, who grew up with a difficult and inept father and an insane mother.  Paul eventually runs away with the circus (the World of Wonders, described in the third book of the series) and is cruelly treated for years.  Dunstan doesn't find out the details until later, but he had carried the guilt of Mary's madness and Paul's loss (for he was presumed dead in Deptford) for a great portion of his life.


Since Mary Dempster had been the locus of so much suffering, but had been, to Dunstan, a saint whom he watched with horrified fascination, the choice of a life writing hagiography seems more sound.  Dunstan's quest to find out the nature of sainthood -- and, perhaps he hopes, to understand the nature of good and evil, guilt and redemption -- became his life's work.  Part of the reason he sticks to it for so long is partially because he knew and consorted with the opposite of Mary Dempster for years -- the one who should have borne the guilt for her madness and the deterioration of her family, the rock-thower Percy-Boyd (Boy).  Dunstan spends much of his life in regular contact with Boy, and Boy was the devil (and a charming, rich, handsome one, at that) to Mary Dempster's suffering saint.  Perhaps Dunstan felt he needed to learn more about sainthood, because he was regularly contaminated by contact with its opposite. 

In Fallen Angels, which character searched for and arrived at a sense of identity?Please explain what led this particular character to arrive at...

In all actuality, all of the men on Perry's squad are searching for a sense of identity, and most of them who remain living at the end of the novel arrive at a sense of identity.  Here are several examples.


--Perry: The novel is, of course, mainly about Perry's growth and recognition of self.  Perry joins the military because he just does not know what else to do.  His mother and brother desperately need money for basic necessities; so the military enables Perry to provide for those needs.  Perry is certainly intelligent enough to go to college but just doesn't see a way to make that possible while providing for his brother Kenny and his own needs such as clothing.  While deployed to Vietnam, Perry begins to think about why he is in the country, what the war is about, and what his purpose is in life.  While he does come to the conclusion that no one seems to know what they're doing in Vietnam, he also realizes that he has developed lasting relationships with his squad members and that he would do anything for them.  On the plane ride home, Perry thinks of the men whom he befriended in combat and has a feeling of being able to accomplish anything now that he has made it through combat.


--Peewee: Perry's best friend jokes about the joining the military because he was dared to, but once he is in the Army, he recognizes that it is the first time that he is treated equally--he has the same as everyone else, and he likes that treatment.  Even though Peewee cracks jokes through most of the novel, after his near-death experience with Perry in the spider hole, he realizes that life is important to him and that he wants to settle down and be able to accomplish something back in the "world."


--Johnson: Big Johnson enlisted because he couldn't find a job as an African American living in the South.  Similar to Peewee, the military provides a way for Johnson to escape his environment.  Even though he does not say much through the novel, Johnson commands respect (This is probably the first time in his life that he realizes his ability to do so.). At the end of the novel, he is still out in the "boonies" with the squad, but he has acquired the confidence that he needs to recognize his leadership abilities.

What is the climax and resolution of "To Build A Fire"?

The climax of "To Build a Fire" occurs when the man is trying to remove his moccasins to warm his feet by the fire and the snow from a bough of the tree collapses onto the fire, effectively destroying his chances of survival and causing him to realize he is going to die.  The resolution takes place after this realization when he begins to run, only to collapse in exhaustion, and finally, as the dog watches faithfully nearby, numbness fills his freezing body. Hope this helps.  For a more detailed summary check the link below. Brenda

What is the story of King Lear about?

At its heart, King Lear is about the relationships between parents and children.  Lear believes that vocal expressions of love prove that his children care for him.  He fails to understand that an honest child is more sincere, and fails to recognize that a child can disagree with a parent but still love him.  The play - through both Lear and the Earl of Gloucester - demonstrates how easily a parent can be manipulated, and how dangerously that parent can misunderstand and take for granted a loving child. 

To briefly summarize the story - King Lear asks his three daughters to speak their love to him, so he can decide who most deserves his inheritance.  When his youngest is honest with him about her complaints, he disinherits her, and plans to move in with the older two.  They quickly weaken him and destroy his belief in their love.  He wanders into a storm, upset and disillusioned.  Cordelia arrives with the French army to restore her father's kingdom.  The two make up, but are soon taken captive by Edmund, who is seeking power.  Cordelia dies, sending Lear into torrents of grief and killing him.  Goneril and Regan fight and both die.  Edgar, the rightful heir to Gloucester, is left to restore the kingdom.

Saturday, January 23, 2016

What literary elements can I compare and contrast in "The Lottery"?I have to do a compare and contrast essay and I think this is a good story.

Perhaps this story should not be pressed for its meaning or theme. Formulations such as “Society engages in ritualized slaughter,” or “Society disguises its cruelty, even from itself,” or “Even decent people seek scapegoats” do not quite seem to fit. Isn’t it possible that the story is an effective shocker, signifying nothing? As many people have pointed out, much of the effect of the story depends on the contrast between the objective narration and the horrifying subject. The story is clever, a carefully wrought thriller, but whether it is an allegory—something about the cruelty of humanity, a cruelty which is invisible to us because it is justified by tradition—is a matter that may be reasonably debated.


The date of the story is significant, June 27, close to the summer solstice, and the season for planting. Some of the names, too, are obviously significant: the ritual is presided over by Mr. Summers, the first man to draw a lot is Mr. Adams, and conservative warnings are uttered by Mr. Warner. Note, too, that the leaders of the attack on Mrs. Hutchinson are Adams (the first sinner) and Graves (the result of sin was death).


One last point about the ritual: Clyde Dunbar, at home with a broken leg, does not participate. Why? Because a sacrificial victim must be unblemished?


Names of characters and setting elements can be compared and contrasted for a fine essay.

How are the stories in Dubliners interlinked?

Look for examlpes of the "seven deadly sins" portrayed in individual stories.

For example "lust" in "The boarding House"

"sloth" in "counterparts"

"envy" in "A Little Cloud"

"wrath" in "Counterparts"

"pride" in "Clay

Also many of the stories have allusions to Dante

The best study on the subject is "The Unity of

dubliners" by  Brewster Ghiselin" which can be found in "Dubliners" Text Criticism and Notes edited byRobert Scholes and A walteon Litz

Most of the characters are paralized in some way, spiritually

emotionally, vicitms of circumstance.

What are the rising action, falling action, and resolution of this story?

The rising action in the story is that the party is getting under way and everyone is forgetting about the world outside the castle that is suffering from the Red Death. The only reminder is when the ebony clock chimes ominously every hour.

The falling action is when the party goers realize that the uninvited guest who appears at midnight is in fact the Red Death himself and they all begin to die.

The resolution of the story is that no one can escape death no matter how fiercely they try to ignore it. The party goers tried to shut death out, but death will always find a way in when the time is right.

What do they do in this game? Do you think the game is an accurate version of what happens in the Radley's home?

The bored children of Harper Lee's novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, make up a game of fantasy revolving around their mysterious and unseen neighbor, Boo Radley. Since little is known about the Radleys, the kids--Jem, Scout and Dill--are left to their imagination to enact what goes on inside the house. Very little is accurate, although some of the action is based on what little information the children have of the family. Scout portrays Mrs. Radley, who primarily sweeps the porch. Dill played old Mr. Radley, who walks up and down the sidewalk and coughs. Boo was played by Jem, who "shrieked and howled from time to time." They continued their game throughout the summer; they "polished and perfected it" by using what gossip and information they could attain. The formerly beautiful Mrs. Radley eventually lost her hair, teeth and even her right forefinger--bitten off by Boo. (Scout tells us that Dill added this imaginative bit of gore.) The big scene, of course, came when Boo plunged the scissors into his father's leg. When the real Mr. Radley would pass by, the children remained frozen in silence, wondering if he had a clue about what their entertaining play-acting was all about.

When writing a sentence, Do you write, "So and so said...", or "So and So stated...." ?I always thought when using "said", you are paraphrasing...

Technically, neither.  I would use "says" or "states."


In formal academic writing (arts & sciences), you will say "says" (informal) or "states" (formal), or you may interchange the two if your discourse relies heavily on testimony.  Regardless, keep it simple and understated: the focus should not be on the lead-in sentence or the tag, but on the quote or paraphrase itself.


The reason it should be present tense is that the language of academia must be current and up-to-date.  Also, present tense suggests not only the past, but it connotes the future as well (that the idea is still relevant).  Even if you are discussing a novel written in 1960 about the 1930s, as The Autobiography of Malcolm X is, you will want to say, "Malcolm X says that the race problem in America is thus and so...".

In language testing, what is a "broken sentence" item and an addition item?Please explain it to me with examples.

Broken sentences and addition items are examples of different tasks that could appear on a test.


In language testing, the use of broken sentences is a form of slot-filling exercise that requires that the test taker completes a sentence with a fragment that makes the most sense. This being said, the broken sentence is essentially an incomplete sentence to be completed by the test taker with the correct option.


Often these broken sentences would appear in an exercise such as: 


____________ are examples of invertebrates.


a) snakes  b) lobsters  c) humans   f) dogs.


An addition item is, as the term implies, the task of adding an answer that makes sense. It could be combining sentences, filling in the blanks, or providing a short answer to a question. Also known as Cloze Tests, they feature (for example) paragraphs with several words removed. The test taker's task is to add the missing items.


The difficulty of the task will denote whether the test taker will have a word bank to choose words from, or not. These addition tasks are popular among language portions of tests such as ASVAB (Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Test), Reading Comprehension tests, the TOEFL (Test of English as a Foreign Language) and most college entrance exams. These tasks look for contextual and textual understanding of words, phrases, and meanings. 

Friday, January 22, 2016

Why does the Irish drama The Playboy of the Western World appeal to the 20th and 21st centuries?John Millingtom Synge author.

The Playboy of the Western World gains its title from the scene in which Christy can't be beaten in play at any of the village sports, hence he becomes the "playboy." The phrase "of the Western World" leads the way into Synge's theme of Irish mythmaking, then still especially noticeable in unsophisticated peasant groups. With the inclusion of this phrase, the myth of the playboy encompasses the whole world. Mythmaking deviates from reality, as is made clear by the stretch of the title: Irish village game championship can't possibly trump an entire world of athletes. Synge isn't discussing a universal theme but rather exposing a particularly Irish theme, that of mythmaking.

The play opened in January of 1907 at Yeats's Irish Literary Theatre to outraged indignation and riots but over the course of the twentieth century has gained ever greater currency among critics. Had Yeats not held a public debate on the concept of artistic freedom, The Playboy may have died an ignoble death. As it happens, though, the play has by later critics been called "the most rich and copious store of character since Shakespeare’’ (P.P. Howe) and a play "riotous with the quick rush of life, a tempest of the passions" (Charles A. Bennett). 

These seem to be the reasons that The Playboy of the Western World has current appeal. Whereas original audiences cared about morality and decorous representations of peoples and countries, the increasing and ever increasing reach for realism, ethnic diversity and authentic representations has brought The Playboy into vogue because it was the avant garde and the precursor of what is presently valued and sought after: unveiled realism. Incidentally, one might argue that this unveiled realism, which is the idol of the present milieu, has been carried so far that "realism" is now a fancy in that it is a reality beyond reality and that it carries such clout that it is creating new reality (of questionable benefit) in its wake, which is a divergent reality from the realism that Synge depicted after living with, studying and capturing in three acts the cultural and psychological realities on the Aran Islands, from which he derived The Playboy of the Western World.

In Gathering Blue, what is an example of a simile and a metaphor? Also, what is the theme of the book?

The first metaphor I see in the book is on page 2.  It says that, as Kira watched her mother's spirit drift away, she could also see the "cindered fragments" of her childhood going up as well.  Obviously, her childhood had not been burned and made into fragments.  So this is a metaphor that is meant to show that her childhood is over.


Then, on page 27, we see Vandara say that Kira drags her leg around "like a useless burden."  That's a simile because it uses the word "like" to directly compare two things.


As for themes, there are many, but you can argue that the most important one is the theme of how important creativity is -- that is why the Council of Guardians takes all the creative kids and controls them.

Thursday, January 21, 2016

What is the theme of the poem "The man with the Hoe?"

Edwin Markham's (1852-1940) "The Man With the Hoe" is a famous poem inspired by the painting L'homme à la houe by Jean Francois Millet (1814-1875).  It was first read in public at a New Year's Eve party in 1898, and published soon afterwards. It portrays the hard labor of much of humanity using the symbolism of a laborer leaning upon his hoe, over burdened by his work, but receiving hardly any rest or reward. It has been translated into more than 30 languages.


Edwin Markham himself has explained the theme of his remarkable poem thus:



"The Hoeman is the symbol of betrayed humanity, the Toiler ground down through ages of oppression, through ages of social injustice. He is the man pushed away from the land by those who fail to use the land, till at last he has become a serf, with no mind in his muscle and no heart in his handiwork. He is the man pushed back and shrunken up by the special privileges conferred upon the Few.


In the Hoeman we see the slow, sure, awful degradation of man through endless, hopeless and joyless labor. Did I say labor ? No—drudgery! This man's battle with the world has been too brutal. He is not going upward in step with the divine music of the world. The motion of his life has been arrested, if not actually reversed. He is a hulk of humanity, degraded below the level of the roving savage, who has a step of dignity, a tongue of eloquence. The Hoeman is not a remnant of prehistoric times; he is not a relic of barbarism. He is the savage of civilization."



The main theme of the poem is that hard physical labor without any reward completely dehumanizes a person. The following line sums the theme of the poem:



Stolid and stunned, a brother to the ox?



The farm laborer has been dehumanized and brutalized so much that he has become almost an "ox!"

What is the story of "Gora" by Rabindranath Tagore?

First, it's important to note that the word "gora" means "fair-skinned."  That being said, the story is set within the Indian society of the Bengali at a time when there was a great dichotomy within.  It was basically the orthodox Hindus vs. the progressive Brahmos.  Therefore, through the book, Tagore raises all of the pertinent concerns of the society spoken through one or more of his characters.  There are so many stories tied within the main plot, it is easy to get lost in the tangents. 


Still, Gora is the main character, the protagonist.  Gora is one of the Hindus and has a very high regard for his religion.  Gora has many leadership qualities and tends to be seen as fairly arrogant (and even violent) as a result.  However, Gora is always positive and dreams continually of an India free of deceit and injustice.  He develops feelings of love towards Sucharita (one of the heroines, a free-thinking woman) and is upset when his friend Binoy is inclined towards Brahmos instead of Hinduism. Binoy and Lolita are another love story within the novel.  Through these experiences and adventures, Gora learns hatred for the caste system and respect for his own mother.  Gora also learns to trust Poresh Babu and his grand maturity.


Thus, Tagore implies that women should be treated as equals and that orthodoxy in religion can still be followed in the meantime.  What I find interesting is that, within the confines of his novel, Tagore is able to blend the orthodox with the progressive in a non-offensive way.  Tagore is certainly an Indian sage of his time.

In the color of water: Who is the intended audience of the book? What do you think of the author's style.

The book The Color of Water was written to appeal to the average middle class book reader.  The author had written the book as a reflection and gift to his mother whom he praised for her journey and strength in raising 12 children into adulthood: Each of the children having been raised with faith and education.  I do not think that the book was written for one general audience but I would say that James wrote the book with intent to reach black and white audiences.  It may have been somewhat of a turn off to devout Jewish readers, but I found it very truthful having been raised in the south by a Jewish/Hebrew family.


The writer’s style was direct and personable.  In reading the book, I felt like I knew the people he was discussing and found the style to be open and inviting.

Where is the story set?

The island is named "Ship Trap Island" in the story because the island's owner fashioned a trap in the ocean to lure his victims (or "opponents") to the island.

Connell uses a lot of imagery (mostly in the use of similes) to describe his setting and how lush and overgrown this jungle-like island is complete with quicksand, swampy areas, beaches, cliffs, and a mansion with only the finest creature comforts around.

What for are useful genetically modified mosquitoes ?

They are the first genetically modified mosquitoes to be resistant to the parasite Plasmodium, through a transformation of their immune system.


Over 300 million new cases of malaria are diagnosed each year worldwide and nearly one million people die from this disease, the victims are, in particular, children and babies from  Africa.


U.S. researchers have created two groups of genetically modified mosquitoes. In the first group, the gene that causes destruction of Plasmodium falciparum by the insect's immune system, was activated in intestinal tissues, where the parasite initially settled.


In the second group of mosquitoes, genetic modification resulted in activation of the immune system against parasite at the level of an organ of mosquito which performs the functions of the liver. Geneticists from the John Hopkins currently trying to obtain a genetically modified mosquito whose immune system to intervene in the both organs.


Researchers currently working on the design of various techniques for dissemination of bacteria in the populations of mosquitoes in nature. However, the techniques of genetic modification of malaria vector, although promising in combating this disease, not enough. Researchers consider that they would need many other "weapons" to defeat malaria.

Wednesday, January 20, 2016

Please explain the line 'Or walk with kings-nor lose the common touch' from the poem "If," by Rudyard Kipling.give detailed answer

As you probably know, this poem is all about what someone (the speaker's son, presumably) must do in order to become a man.  The line you cite gives two of the things the son must do.


The son must be able to mix with anyone.  He must think that he is good enough to "walk with kings" and he must act in a way that will make high status people like kings respect him.


But, at the same time, he must not get stuck up.  He must not "lose the common touch."


So what the speaker is saying is that, to be a "man" you need to be proud and self-confident, but you need to still be humble at the same time.

In Chapter 18 of To Kill a Mockingbird, what kind of effort was Mr. Gilmer putting into the trial? What is Atticus's perception of Judge Taylor?

Scout describes Mr. Gilmer in this way:



The solicitor, a Mr. Gilmer, was not well known to us. He was from Abbottsville; we saw him only when court convened, and that rarely, for court was of no special interest to Jem and me.



So the children are unfamiliar with his tactics in court. However, when Bob Wewell is rude to him, Scout feels sorry for him, saying that Mr. Gilmer is just doing his job, like Atticus. Now, one can argue that he was doing the best he could to win his case. This is probably true, although he seems slightly more reasonable than many of the people in Maycomb regarding the issues of rape and crime. However, he also speaks condescendingly to Tom, calling him "boy" and dismissing his remarks. So, no matter how he personally feels about the trial, he will do everything he can to win it. He speaks with an air of hostility against Tom to capitalize on the prejudice already felt against him. This hostility is so strong that even Dill, who probably does not understand its source, can sense it. He breaks into tears and must be taken from the courtroom.


Atticus considers Judge Taylor a fair and sympathetic man. He is the one who appointed Atticus as Tom's defender in the first place, & Atticus is relieved that he is the sitting judge for the trial. He feels that Tom has a better chance with Judge Taylor than anyone else. Like Atticus and Mr. Gilmer, Judge Taylor is doing his job to the best of his ability. When Link Deas speaks up on behalf of Tom, Judge Taylor is ready to throw him out and declare a mistrial. He is also keenly aware of the sensitive nature of the proceedings, so he attempts to make everyone, witnesses and audience, comfortable.

Tuesday, January 19, 2016

What does the scaffold represent to the puritan community in The Scarlet Letter?

The scaffold, in Puritan society, was a place of public penance. This is where many punishments were carried out and this place was chosen for that task because it was very public.  Since it stood up above the crowd, most people could easily see the person being punished.  Punishments varied from a simple public announcement of a person's sin/crime to some very severe physical punishments.  Thus, the scaffold becomes the symbol of humiliation and punishment.

What are the moral values in the story handsomest drowned man in the world by marquez?

The moral values in the story are best seen in the townspeople's reactions to something so unique, different, exotic, and strange as this man washing up ashore, dead, and who looked so strikingly.


In a morally-corrupted society, a finding of this kind would have provoked chaos, and people would have cathartically expressed their own fears and horrors of life through this man's death.


However, the village to which Esteban washed ashore was so distant from society, that not even boats stop in their shores. Hence, Garcia Marquez is giving us an allegory of innocence: Something that keeps itself guarded from the intrusions of malice and the mundane.


The moral value is then, that in a place where innocence is king, the chances for finding kindness, honesty, and love are equally possible. The townspeople valued the person of Esteban in death as if he were alive; they took moral and physical responsibility for his well-being, they gave him dignity, and they created a personality for him.


They gave him a form of existence even after death, and he, in turn, gave them pride, self-sufficiency, motivation, unity, and collective love. The synergism between the dead and the alive, the known, and the unknown, and the common with the strange all are bound together through love, and the love Marques presents here is only possibly achieved through the agency of innocence.

Monday, January 18, 2016

In what way is Murder in the Cathedral different from the other plays like as Doctor Faustus, Hamlet, The Alchemist?

Murder in the Cathedral is a drama written as verse. In T.S. Eliot's time, major dramas had not been written in verse for around 300 years. For example, in 1671 John Milton published Samson Agonistes. It was written as a verse drama but Milton specified in the preface that it was not to be performed. So one way in which Murder in the Cathedral is different from Hamlet, Dr. Faustus, The Alchemist, etc. is that, though they are all verse dramas, Eliot's is a revival of an unpopular and disused form while the others were the favored and popular modes of drama in their eras. They are similar, though, in that each drew on other sources, some drew on history, like Shakespeare's history dramas, and some on legend or tale like Dr. Faustus.


Though done in verse, Murder in the Cathedral and the others are different in that the verse in the early dramas is written using the vernacular of the era and Eliot's is written using the vernacular of his era. This sounds like a similarity, but it is a similarity that leads to a great difference in style, tone and musicality of the verse.


The thematic concerns are somewhat different in that while all discuss important weighty themes, Eliot turns his two themes of the spirit versus the flesh and obedience into vehicles that illustrate then contemporary issues such as privacy and religious intrusion into individuals' lives.


The tragic hero of Murder in the Cathedral, Thomas Becket, differs from Aristotelian and Elizabethan tragic heroes in that Eliot leaves him free of a "tragic flaw." He has no internal weakness or failure of character that blinds him or misleads him, he commits no tragic error in judgement; he has no ambitions that drive him into vain misdeeds, etc. In addition, Becket's death sets a new heroic style when his death is one that fills the audience with the idea of peace and hope instead of pity and agony. Eliot also divides the physical tragedy of Becket's murder from the spiritual reality of Becket's life, which is that his spiritual life supersedes his physical death.

What is the summary of Chapter 17 in To Sir With Love?

The Half-Yearly Report of the Students' Council, an assembly entirely arranged and presented by the students themselves, is held on November 15. Miss Joseph and Denham preside, and the meeting begins with an address by Mr. Florian, the headmaster. Following his lengthy but well-received presentation, each class takes a turn reporting, through their chosen representatives, on what they have been studying in each subject so far. Finally, a panel of teachers is chosen for each class to answer any questions pertaining to the reports which have been given. The lowest class begins first, and it is obvious that as the students progress through the ranks there is "a marked development in their ability to express themselves." Mr. Braithwaite's class, being the oldest, goes last.


Miss Joseph begins the highest class's proceedings by explaining that the common theme underlying all their studies this term is the interdependency of mankind. Potter speaks in the field of math, focusing on how greater understanding in the world is fostered by the use of common weights and measures. Miss Pegg and Jackson speak on geography, and Miss Dare and Fernman discuss the subject of physiology, with Fernman stealing the show by exhibiting a model of a human skeleton and stressing the class' conclusion that "basically all people were the same." Miss Dodd reports on history, and Miss Joseph on domestic science. Denham creates a stir by speaking on the required subject of P.T. and games, complaining that the class "was ill-conceived and pointless.


Mr. Weston, Mrs. Dale-Evans, and Miss Phillips are chosen at random to answer student questions arising from the senior presentations. When Denham pursues his inquiry on the necessity of requiring all students to take P.T., Mr. Weston responds quite ridiculously, trying to bluster his way out of the subject, and offering no coherent argument for the requirement's continuance. Surprisingly, quiet Miss Phillips steps in and gives a sturdy defense of the practice, and Denham, knowing that he has been outwitted, has no choice but to respectfully cease his heated protest (Chapter 17).

Sunday, January 17, 2016

What did Faber design that allowed him to stay in constant contact with Montag?

The thing he designed is what is called "the bullet" in the book.  It is a little two-way communicator that fits in the person's ear and is about the size of a .22 caliber bullet.  He gives it to Montag just as Montag is about to leave Faber's house after the first time he goes there.


Faber has made this thing over the years because he has dreamed about leading a rebellion against the society.  He has hoped that there would be people who would go around undermining society and he, Faber, could sit there behind the scenes, telling them what to do without being in danger himself. He says this shows what a coward he is.

What are the differing roles and functions the men and women have in Igbo society?Just by examining the way of family life and living arrangements..

The Ibo society has a communal structure, reflected in families and the larger village itself. The gender roles would probably be considered "traditional"-men are the providers, women are in charge of the domestic sphere. For men, this role involves some sort of physical prowess, as demonstrated by the importance placed upon the wrestling competitions. The ability to provide factors into mens' functions as well, as one who can harvest vast amounts of crops can not only feed his family, but may sell the rest for extra wealth. Thus farming and growing healthy yams is considered part of the male arena in the book. Finally, strength on the battlefield is respected in the culture. A man who brings home the heads of the enemy is considered a hero, and carries the sign of virility. Men also have many wives, another symbol of virility.


Women are in charge of some farming (not yams) & of course, raising children. Children are raised by all wives, sharing the responsibilities among all members of the family. Also, all chores are shared amongst the wives and children. Wives have their own huts, where their children return at the end of the day. The husband has his own hut as well. There may be some advantages to this arrangement: less stress on one person, perhaps. For women, strength is defined in another way. Women who show strength are able to bear children, grow and harvest women's crops, and take care of their husbands without complaint. They suffer blows, guide their children through sickness, and remain steadfast in the face of abuse. Their strength becomes a moral, internal strength, opposed to the brute physical strength of the men.

What and who is an average person?

The answer to this would depend on a few things.


First of all, what characteristic or characteristics are you trying to measure?  If you are looking for the person who is of average height, the answer will be different than if you are looking for the average skin color.


Second, what is your population?  The average height for people in Denmark, for example, will be different from the average height of people in the Philippines.


In order to find what the average person is, you must know the answers to these questions.

What does Macbeth claim is his only motivation for the assassination?

Macbeth says in his speech at the beginning of Act I, scene 7, that there are many reasons NOT to kill Duncan - Duncan is his cousin, and a good and well-loved king, and his guest.  However, Macbeth admits that the reason he still wants to go through with it is his "vaulting ambition" that overleaps his concerns.

Saturday, January 16, 2016

Why has the “Party” gone to such tremendous efforts to ensnare and trap Winston? part 2

In the eyes of the Party, Winston poses a true threat.  The Party maintains power by using mind control, by teaching others to think in ways that benefit the Party (Big Brother).  It seems reasonable to assume that the only real fear of the party is losing its power; its power can only be lost via the power of free thought. Freedom is contagious; its power grows many fold with the addition of each person who recognizes some evil in Big Brother.  If you think of free thought as a contaminant (from the Party's viewpoint), it may be easier to recognize that Winston, as person aware of truth, could share that awareness with others.  Each person who realizes some degree of truth may infect myriad others with his knowledge.  In essence, the Party must stop Winston, and others like him, or risk everything they have.

What are the themes in "A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning"?

John Donne wrote the poem "A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning" for his wife before leaving on a trip. In it, scholars have found allusions to religious belief, to death, and to science. On the surface, though, he is telling his wife not to be sad because he is leaving. Their love is not like that of ordinary people, the "dull sublunary lovers." He says that these kinds of lovers can't stand to be apart because their love is based on appearances, on physical things, on "care less eyes, lips and hands to miss."

The love shared by Donne and his wife is higher than this. Theirs is a spiritual love. They are as one soul, so that where one goes the other is there as well in spirit. So sadness and tears at parting are not appropriate for them. Their love will grow from the anticipation of reuniting.

See the links below for a discussion of other themes in the poem.

Friday, January 15, 2016

Describe the use of light and dark imagery in Heart of Darkness. Is there a difference between "dark" and "darkness"?

Try to think for a moment about the literal and figurative meanings of light and dark.  In the story, the literal light people are the English, who have colonized this part of Africa. Because they are Caucasian, they are "light."  The dark people are the natives of Africa, who, being black, are obviously darker-skinned people.  Now, generally, at least in the Western world, light and dark are often used metaphorically to represent positive and negative attributes.  For example, we will say that someone has a dark soul, meaning he or she is evil somehow, and we use sunshine to represent goodness or happiness.  These metaphors of light and dark are powerful in Western society, and if you pay close attention, you will be able to read or hear dozens of them.


So, generally speaking, a novel that concerns light and dark is going to tend to use these figuratively to represent some kind of goodness and evil or happiness and unhappiness.  However, in The Heart of Darkness, this concept is flipped. It is the white people who are the bad guys, and it is the black people who are victimized by the white people. If you read the story carefully, you will see that many of the "white" or "light" images are attached to the English, who pretty much raped Africa, as did any number of other colonial powers.  The images of the black people, while dark in nature, are about the darkness of what the English did, not about any figurative darkness of the natives themselves. 


As to the difference between "dark" and "darkness," my thinking is that it depends entirely on how these words are used.  I would say that "darkness" in this context refers to the darkness in the hearts and minds of the English, while "dark" is merely a descriptive term, which characterized the color of the victims of the colonizers. 

What are the three elements Faber said are missing from a world without books. Was Montag able to recover all of these elements in Fahrenheit 451?

I think what you are talking about is where Faber says the world needs


  • Good books -- not just any books, but good ones.

  • The time to read them.

  • And the right to act on the ideas you get from the first two things.

I don't really think Montag actually recovers any of these because we don't know what happens after the book ends.  Montag has helped to save a good book, and he will probably have the time to read them after the war is over.  But we have no idea what the government and society will turn out like after the war.

What problems and challenges did Stephen Hawking have to face or overcome?

Stephen Hawkins is one of the most brilliant and famous scientists of this era.  He is classified as a physicist.  Hawkins was raised by a mother who was a Communist.  He was an atheist since early youth, but had two close friends who had converted to Christianity.   This led Hawkins to begin to thin king about the idea of God and man’s existence.  He remained an atheist.


In 1962 he was diagnosed with ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.  Doctors predicted that he would only have two years to live.  His girlfriend, who became his wife, helped him to cope with the adjustment and fight depression.  The disease began to break down his neurological pathways, but did not affect his mind.  His intellect remained in tact.  He eventually became wheel chair restricted, lost the ability to verbally communicate, and control over his limbs and body functions.


Despite his physical restrictions, Hawkins was able to write many books covering areas in science of black holes, the quantum evaluation theories,


And other issues relative to cosmology, the existence of the universe.

Which US president had wooden teeth?

It has always been said that George Washington had wooden teeth.  However, historians have since found out that this is not true.  His teeth, as it turns out, were actually made of hippopotamus ivory and some other things.


Apparently, George Washington was quite concerned about his dental health.  He brushed regularly, used mouthwash and tried to get dental treatment.  However, dental knowledge was very poor in those days and (it seems) he was just unlucky.  At any rate, he started losing his teeth in his twenties.


By the time he became president Washington had only one of his own teeth.

What was the balance between agriculture and manufacturing in the United States during 1786?I am laying out a American history DBQ i am doing and...

You are right to assume that the US was very agrarian during the time you mention.  According to one text I teach out of, 80% of American households were "involved in agricultural production."  (Amusingly enough, that stat is on a page that shows the exact medal you are talking about...)


As for your other questions:


The Northern states had a lot of farming.  A society like that would have never been based in the South because it is promoting small farms worked by their owners (that's why you don't have a bunch of slaves on the medal).  Southerners would never "venerate the plow" -- to them it would have been something that slaves used.


So it's not that there isn't enough agriculture.  What's going on is that they are asserting that farming is morally superior to other forms of labor.  This would likely be because a farmer would be "his own man" and not just have to work for someone.


I hope that helps... you didn't mention what the actual DBQ question was, so I can't tell you more about how this "document" would fit in.

In Chapter 25What causes Scout to comment that Jem was acting more like a girl every day. What definition of "girl" does she imply?

While waiting to go with Atticus to see Helen Robinson, Jem urges Scout not to kill a roly-poly bug.  Jem has been deeply affected by the events of the trial.  He understands the senslessness of Tom's conviction and death, and he feels sensitive about the innocent.  Scout, after years of being around and watching boys, believes that to be a "girl" is to be sensitive and "tender-hearted".  A girl is sensitive and does not crush bugs because bugs are living beings.  Therefore, she connects Jem's concern with girl-like behavior.  It will be some time yet before Scout matures in the way that Jem has and begins to understand the cruelty of the world and to appreciate the beauty in it.

Thursday, January 14, 2016

Which are the requirements for dielectric material used to obtain optical fibers?

Optical fibers are long, flexible cylinders, with diameter 10-100μm, in which light rays propagate through multiple total internal reflections on surface of the fibers' side. There are gradient optical fibers, characterized by the fact that refractive index is maximum in the center of the fiber, gradually decreasing toward its periphery, so  that total reflection of light is more complicated than in case of a single optical fiber.


 Regardless of the fields that they are used, optic fibers are light guides used for sharing information with less energy lost, from one place to another place.


No matter of the composition chosen, the dielectric material used to obtain optical fibers must answer to the following requirements:


- to have better transparency at the wavelength of the light signal used;


- to possess chemical stability in time;


- to be easily processed in all stages of technological process.

Wednesday, January 13, 2016

WHY WOULD AN INCREASE IN SAVINGS PUT DOWNWARD PRESSURE ON THE INTEREST RATE?THIS, BASICALLY,DEALS WITH CLASSICAL ECONOMISTS AND INTEREST RATE...

Relationship between rates of saving and interest can be understood in terms of relationship between supply, demand, and price of credit. The savings of individuals by way of deposits in banks and other forms of deposits constitute the supply of money on credit. The money thus available through savings is then loaned to borrowers. Greater is the willingness and ability of individuals to save, greater is the total amount saved and available for lending to borrowers. And when the supply of funds available with banks for lending  is higher they need to lower the interest rates charged to the borrowers to induce them to borrow the increased funds available. At the same time when banks find that individuals are ready to deposit more funds than they can loan out at existing interest rates paid to depositors, they reduce the amount they are willing to pay as interest to the borrowers. In this way increased saving puts downward pressure on rates of interest paid by banks to depositors, as well as rates charged by them from borrowers.


However, it is important to note that the discussion above presents only one side of the supply and demand behaviour. The demand for credit for borrowers depends not only on interest rate but also on the general level of economic activity. Thus when economy is booming, both the demand for credit and interest rates may move upward simultaneously. Put another way, level of savings is one of the determinants of interest levels. The demand for credit because of  general economic condition is another important determinant of interest rates.

Was Frankenstein mean at first?

As a creation that was man made, not heavenly created, Frankenstein the monster has no soul.  Shelley is very clear to illustrate this.  He is not "nice" or "mean" but merely full of purpose.  He struggles not with a moral code that governs most of human society, and feels no remorse for the crimes he commits.  He is apathetic to the world outside of him.  Shelley was viciously against science for science's sake, and wanted to portray this tragic character as lost, attempting to fit into some society, but really not a part of any.

What are the main themes in Mountain Language by Harold Pinter?

The three most prominent theme in Mountain Language by Harold Pinter is that of meaninglessness. this meaninglessness hinges on the mountain language that they speak which has been outlawed. As they attempt to make logical sense and order out of their imprisonment, they are foiled at every attempt because there is no logic behind the rules they are made to follow. The meaninglessness that confronts them leads to isolation and anguish. Building this isolation, which is real and not just philosophical for the prisoners, is the disintegration of communication between the two language sides: nothing can be done because language breaks down to absurdities.

The themes of social protest and censorship stem from the disintegration of language. Scenes in which assistance or help is denied because language breaks down to absurdities constitute social protests at inhumane treatment and attitudes and artificially imposed limitation and restrictions. Incited by the language breakdowns comes censorship in the form of prohibitions against the mountain language being used for communication between prisoners. [This is not fantasy, of course, as such censorship is an integral part of many school systems where unintelligible dialects are spoken by local school children.]

What is the central idea in Steinbeck's story "The Chrysanthemums?"

The central idea in Steinbeck’s “The Chrysanthemums” concerns a woman’s loneliness and unfulfilling life in her marriage, which she sublimates by gardening and tries to satisfy through her fantasies with the tinker man, only to be brought back to the reality of her loneliness when she discovers that the tinker man had no real feelings for her at all and lacks the sensitivity she seeks in a man and in life.  Steinbeck validates a woman's sexuality in this story while also depicting a woman as facing enormous difficulties in satisfying sexual and other needs through men who lack own depth and sensitivity.

In what ways does Dana explode the slave stereotypes of the "house nigger"? In what ways does she transcend them?

The most obvious way in which Dana transcends slave stereotypes, or indeed, expectations for all humans anywhere, is that she can and does travel through time. This gives her extensive knowledge of what will happen, making her a kind of augmented wise woman.

 

The other ways she transcends/explodes stereotypes are much more mundane these days. She speaks directly to whites as equals, she expects fair treatment, she retains the capacity for compassion, she carries a broad perspective with her, and she feels desire openly, with little concern for power dynamics.

Issues of race and imperialism.

I am assuming that you would like some comments on these issues as they figure in Heart of Darkness, and I can certainly do so. However, in order to get a less general response, it is a good idea to pose a question or provide more specificity than you have right now.


The book is a reflection of the reality that imperialism almost inevitably involves the colonizing of a country of darker-skinned people by a lighter-skinned people. Sometimes there is a racial difference, but not always.  The colonizing of India, for example, did not generally involve a racial difference, since Indians have been considered Caucasian by anthropologists and India was occupied by the English  and the Portuguese, also Caucasian.  But this novella concerns a section of Africa that held black native peoples, and since it is the English colonists and merchants who occupy the area, certainly, there is an issue of race. 


Since in the Western world, we tend to use darkness to symbolize evil and lightness to symbolize good, a person might reasonably suppose that the title suggests that Africa is a dark, thus evil, continent, colonized by light, thus good, people, but that is not the case. It is the English who have dark hearts, not the native Africans. 


Each "scene" as the narrator travels up the river to the heart of this darkness is carefully selected to show the English in the worst possible light, as a people who treat others inhumanely for their own gains of money and power. 


There are those who seem to think that Conrad glorified colonialism and portrayed Africans as savages, but I think a careful reading of the story does not support this. 

Tuesday, January 12, 2016

What is Holden's attitude toward other guys?

In The Catcher in the Rye, Holden acts two different ways toward males, depending on their ages.  While he venerates children, he is passive-agressive to those who are his age and older.


Holden compares every male to his dead brother Allie.  Allie was his idealized male figure--uncorrupted, smart, artistic. All other males--including his father, his brother, and himself--pale by comparison.  He mentions his father only in passing, and he calls his older brother an artistic "prostitute."  Most others are deemed "phonies."  Holden wears his red hunting hat to honor Allie (who had red hair).  In terms of gender, Holden feels inferior to his brother, obvious signs of survivor's guilt.


Holden sets himself up to fail with males who are his age and older.  He verbally instigates fights with Stradlater and Maurice, who beat him up because he asks for it.  Although he calls himself a "pacifist," Holden likes to feeling victimized by these stronger, more macho males.


Holden is either extremely jealous of other, heterosexual males or he is paranoid and homophobic of other homosexual males. He hates Stradlater because he openly brags of his sexual promiscuity before his date with Jane, and he hates "flits" (homosexuals), especially after Mr. Antolini makes a pass at him (or so he claims).  Regardless, Holden has sexual identification issues.

In Othello how does the way Shakespeare begin the play immediately involve the audience?

The play begins in medias res with a somewhat heated discussion between Iago and Roderigo. We don't know exactly what the discussion is about, but we do know that there is obvious tension between the two men as Roderigo is angry with Iago that he did not reveal some information.  Iago, more placating, tells Roderigo that they share a mutual dislike for the same man.  The audience is immediately engaged.  We'd are eavesdropping on what might escalate to something bigger, and we are curious as to the source of their disagreement.  Iago goes on to reveal that the pompous Othello passed him over for a promotion when he clearly was more experienced and more deserving of the position of lieutenant than the inexperienced, youthful Cassio.  Our sympathies are somewhat aroused, since we all know what it is like to be placed second to someone we consider our inferior.


Later Iago reveals that he plans to get revenge on Othello: "I follow him to serve my turn upon him."  And later he declares, "I am not what I am."  As we begin to learn how Iago thinks, we are begin to readjust our opinions of both Iago and Othello.  Iago, we realize, is crafty and vindictive, and he will cause trouble for his general.


If the audience is not engaged at this point, Iago's plan to wake up Brabantio, Desdemona's father, and tell him of Othello and Desdemona's elopement will do the trick.  Iago, shouting, uses crude and vulgar images of Desdemona and Othello sleeping together:  "a Barberry horse is covering your white ewe," and "making the beast with two backs." And the audience is able at this point to piece together the reason behind Roderigo's anger.  He wanted Desdemona for himself.  Brabantio is so enraged that he gathers a small army of men to confront Othello.


The tension in the very first scene escalates from a small argument between two disgruntled men to a force of men raising swords against Othello.  We are fed just enough information to keep us wanting to know more, and as our respect for Iago's intelligence grows, our opinion of his moral character declines, and if Iago can cause such chaos in the first scene, we wait in anticipation to see what havoc he will cause in the play as a whole.

How did President Carter's foreign policy approach differ from that of Nixon and Ford? Also...which do you believe was more effective? why?

The main difference between President Carter's foreign policy and the policies of Presidents Nixon and Ford was that Carter's foreign policy was based more on idealism and less on force/self-interest than the policies the other two pursued.


Perhaps the most famous example of Carter's more idealistic foreign policy was his decision to make a treaty giving the Panama Canal Zone "back" to Panama.  There was no need for the US to do this, and you can argue that it makes us less secure, but it seems more like the right thing to do.


It is hard to say if Carter was more or less effective.  Nixon's policies were not able to win the Vietnam War, but they were able to make better relations with Red China.  Carter's policies managed to get the Camp David Accords made, but were unable to prevent the Iran Hostage Crisis.

In The Book Thief what books does Liesel steal, what is the importance of each book?

The very first book that Liesel steals is called The Gravedigger's Handbook, and she snags it from a cemetery, close to a grave that an actual employee had been digging.  In this rather dry and morbid book, it gives very specific instructions on how to properly dig graves, place coffins inside, and maintain a cemetary and grave sites.  It is a how-to book for cemetary employees.  This book is the one that Liesel learns how to read with, under the patience guidance of her foster father, Hans.


This book is a significant choice for a couple reasons.  The first is that she grabbed after the burial of her own little brother.  So, that the book is about graves and burial is a fitting theme, since that is something that Liesel was very, very familiar with at that time in her life.  This is also an interesting grab because the narrator of her own story is death itself, another element that is closely associated with graves.


Another book that she steals is from the pile of burning books at one of the frenzied Hitler youth rallies that was being held in her town's courtyard.  This is significant because it was a direct act of defiance against the Hitler youth; if he had been caught, there could have been serious repercussions.  It is also interesting, because they only burned books that were considered unpatriotic, or that went against the Nazi idealogue.  And here is Liesel, a member of their very own party, desiring to read a book that they had singled out for burning because of its dangerous ideals.


Other books after this come directly from the home of the governer's house, which again, if she had been held accountable for, would have resulted in serious consequences.  She gets lucky, and finds a sympathetic friend in the governer's wife.  All of the books that she ends up stealing are either acts of rebellion that could have been dangerous for her, or that fit in with her life and the story itself. I hope that those thoughts helped; good luck!

Using Act 4, Scene 2 of Macbeth, explain the difference between pathos and tragedy.

Act 4, Scene 2 of Shakespeare's Macbeth provides an excellent example of the difference between pathos and tragedy.  The incident involving the murders of Lady Macduff and her son create sympathy, pity and compassion on the part of the audience for the two victims as well as Macduff.  This is pathos.


Tragedy, on the other hand, involves a tragic flaw on the part of the "victim."  Macbeth, for instance, is a slave to his ambition.  When he is killed he is the cause of his own downfall.  Some flaw contributes to the downfall of a tragic protagonist.  It may or may not create sympathy, etc., as Hamlet's death may in Hamlet, but either way something about the tragic figure contributes to his fall.


This is not the case in pathos.  Lady Macduff and her son do nothing to contribute to their murders.

In chapter 1 of Lord of the Flies, how is Piggy indirectly responsible for the blowing of the conch?

Piggy has prior experience with conchs as his Aunt had one and she taught him how to blow it.  Piggy, in turn, teaches Ralph how to blow the conch, and from that moment on it is used to keep the peace and order among the boys on the island until Jack declares it is no longer needed.

Monday, January 11, 2016

Can the blood sucking bats kill a man?By blood suck.

Species of bats that are feeding with blood, from Peru, have increased the number of attacks on humans and the problem is the transmission of rabies.


While the rabies turn any creature into an aggressive one, in case of vampire bats, the symptoms are disorientation followed by muscle weakness and ultimately death.


Their bite is shallow so that victims do not realize that they were attacked. Along with the bringing of cattle in Peru,as about 500 years ago, the bat population has increased. Due to deforestations and loss of animals from Amazonian forests, bats have found another source of food: people. Researchers are trying to control rabies through the thorough analysis of the bats from these places, so that, in the future,to succeed in predicting the areas inhabited by people who should be vaccinated.


So, the main problem induced by the bites of vampire bats is not the blood sucking, but the transmission of rabies.

What is a primary dressing?

A primary wound dressing is the piece of gauze or material that is placed directly on top of the wound itself. It may have anti-bacterial ointment or some kind of medication on it, for example to stop bleeding. It may also be wet in order to keep the wound from drying out.


It is very important that the primary dressing be kept clean and free of dirt and debris. Most of the time primary dressings need to be changed. This can be very painful as many times the wound has dried to the dressing. Sometimes putting some saline on the dressing before taking it off can moisten the skin and help to relieve some of the pain when removing it. It also needs to be removed very slowly.


The secondary dressing is what holds the primary dressing in place. An example would be tape.

What are two themes of the modern/post modern era?i need to know alittle about the themes also

I usually think about the modern and the postmodern as related but separate eras. Still, it's possible to see them as one era and to talk about some themes or concerns that they share. My comments focus entirely on literature, but it's possible to talk about other areas, too, such as architecture or the visual arts.


One possible theme is multiplicity. Rather then present the unified views of a small group of people, in a unified form, the modern and postmodern literary work often seeks to present a range of views in a range of forms. A 19th-century novel is often very nicely structured, and all of the plot lines are tied together and resolved before the work ends. Such a novel often opens with a clear setting, with names of characters, etc., before any dialogue begins. A modern or postmodern novel (e.g. Mumbo Jumbo) may often open in a jarring manner, may never answer the questions that it raises at the start, and may incoporate forms that don't normally belong in novels.


Another possible theme is interiority. The modern/postmodern didn't invent the idea of the inner self, of course, but modern and postmodern literature has taken interiority to a new level. Stream-of-consciousness is one example.

Sunday, January 10, 2016

Find the ratio of the areas of two circles whose radii are 4 cm and 7 cm.

A circles area is pi times the square of its radius or area A of the circle is given by:


A = pi*r^2


So,if the radii of the two circles are a and b, then their areas are pi*a^2 and pi*b^2, where pi is a constant = circumference/(2*radius). So, the circles'  areas  with radius a and b, are in the ratio, pi*a^2 : pi*b^2 = a^2 : b^2.


Here, a = 4cm and b=7^cm. Therefore, the circles' areas are in the ratio,  (4cm)^2  : (7cm)^2  or  in the ratio 16:49

What will be some good topic ideas for a 10-12 page paper??Our professor left the option open, but the problem with that is that i have no idea...

I would choose something that I am comfortable with. You could take a poem, story, or drama, and with an understanding of its theme, write a more coherent paper. You could divide up the work into its component parts, like plot, characters, point of view, setting, symbolism, structure, style, tone, and idea or theme. You could look for each of these elements in the work or you could possibly focus on just a few, as long as they support your theme.


I would tend to stay away from any type of criticism unless you have studied it and think that you can handle it reasonably well.

What are some Parallelisms for... 1 Gollum looking for the ring. 2 Thoring looking for the Arkenstone. 3 Smaug looking for the cup that Bilbo...

I'm sure that a number of people here are eager to answer your question, but they -- including me! -- are probably not sure what you are talking about when you write "parallelisms." Could you define that term or give an example?


If you mean what are some ways to describe how each of these characters desires the item they seek, I may be able to offer some help with at least the first item. Gollum is absolutely obsessed with the ring and wants nothing more than to be reunited with it. Whereas Thorin might be acting out of a sense of honor and Smaug out of a sense of insult (who should dare steal from him!), Gollum seems to be acting out an extreme, self-destructive obsession.


There are all kinds of allegorical readings of Tolkien's fiction, some better than others (see the links below for two examples). When you write "parallelisms," maybe you mean these sorts of allegorical readings.


In any case, please consider editing your question to provide more information about what you're looking for.

Saturday, January 9, 2016

What to understand by Portfolio risk?Can any one please help me to answer the question?

In business and finance the term portfolio refers to the collection of various investment of an individual or a firm in various bonds, stocks or other securities and instruments. Portfolio risk is refers to the extent of risk or possible variation associated regarding the amount of return the individual or the firm is likely to earn on the portfolio.


Broadly a specific investment in a portfolio can be judged for its riskiness along a scale. On one end of this scale a risk less investment offers a guaranteed rate of return on the amount invested, but generally the quantity of return is low. On the other end of the scale are very risky investment which may end giving a very high return or may actually result in a heavy loss. The risk of the total portfolio is assessed on the basis of combined likelihood of variation in the combined profit or loss on all the investments in the portfolio.

Explain the relevance of these words from Part 2 of Fahrenheit 451. cowardly old fool dentifrice bradicate all firemen green bullet leisure...

Cowardly old fool is what Faber calls himself to explain why he doesn't want to help Montag.


Denham's dentifrice is the product that is being advertised in the subway, making Montag unable to think.


Eradicate all firemen is, more or less, the goal of the rebellion Montag is considering.


The green bullet is the thing Faber gives Montag to put in his ear so Faber can help him deal with Beatty and other things.


Leisure is free time -- talking here about free time needed to read and think about books


Quality refers to the books -- need good quality books.


Right to carry out action refers to the need to have the right to act on what the books say.   These last three things are what are needed to reform society.


Sieve and the sand is the metaphor for this chapter.  It refers to the difficulty of filling a sieve up with sand -- that is what Montag feels like he is going to have to do.

Why does Ponyboy say about the Greasers, "We deserve a lot of our trouble"?

I believe he says this because they are, after all, somewhat of criminals.


Many of the kids are both good and bad, but there is not one of the Greasers who is not willing to participate in illegal acts for no really good reason.  The Greasers are all willing to go fight with other gangs, to beat up Socs who come in their territory, stuff like that.


So, they tend to go out looking for trouble, stealing things, doing things like that.  So even though they have (except for Dally, perhaps) good sides, they also do a lot of stuff that makes them deserve trouble.

Why did John forget one of the Ten Commandments?

In this play, Proctor is a tragic hero. The symbolism of him forgetting the adultery commandment is that it is representative of his tragic flaw. The mistake he made was of course having the affair with Abigail. This mistake keeps him from coming forward to “out” Abigail until Elizabeth is condemned. Later, he confesses to lechery, sexual immorality, and forfeits his good name and reputation in an attempt to show the court Abigail is a liar.



Overall, his omission of the adultery commandment contributes to our understanding of Proctor as a tragic hero with a tragic flaw. Nonetheless, he tries to be good again and dies trying.

Friday, January 8, 2016

What other examples show Scout's courage besides the mob incident?Details :)

I agree with all of the items in bullgatortail's list aside from one, the item that also appears in your question. Jem certainly may be said to demonstrate courage in the scene involving the lynch mob outside of the jail in Harper Lee's novel To Kill a Mockingbird; however, Scout does not. Jem is very much aware that her father is at risk; he refuses to budge, and the other two children simply follow his lead and stay as well. Scout's reason for staying, aside from following Jem's lead, is her desire to be recognized by Mr. Cunningham, the father of her friend at school. She does not recognize the immediate danger posed by the lynch mob, and her innocence -- not her courage -- is what ultimately causes the mob to disperse.


The narration in the novel is interesting because of such moments of dramatic irony. The adult narrator is aware of something that the child character is not.

Explain the commercial and social concerns regarding 'GM crops'?Commercial impact: possible market. Social impact: group of people affected,...

The commercial concerns come primarily from the smaller end farmers such as the organic farmers, and hometown farmers which will be undoubtedly beaten down in sales and requests by the booming GM market. The GM market will bring with it very fancy publicity and advertisement giants which will push the sales even further, leaving the home-grown farmers behind.


The social concerns relate to the way in which GM crops will integrate as staple foods for consumption and how will their effect on the market affect local producers to the point of not bringing them to financial ruin. If this happened, jobs could be endangered in several aspects.


Europe, however, has begun speaking against GM crops because of the reverse effect of some crops on monarch caterpillars. Along with this, they wonder if the GM modification will also create new allergens for humans. Not alone, they do worry about the crops that are naturally grown in the normal market in terms of the economy of third world countries already in dire straights.


For this, the benefits of GM are the production of good food, more sales, fast food growing, more exposure to healthy products. The risks are the effect on pollination in animals, the creation of new allergens, and the lack of commerce for low-end farmers. Enclosed in this response is a link with information on the recent European issues with GM markets.

Why is Daisy winking "ferociously towards the fervent sun" and is there a symbolic meaning to this? The question is from chapter one, page 17 or 18...

Daisy is merely parroting her husband's words here. She does not have any true convictions, in this instance she is merely mirroring what she has obviously heard from Tom numerous times.

She is detached in what she is saying, her face uplifted toward the sun. Daisy clearly does not share strong feelings on the subject of racism. Looking up into the bright sun shows her disinterest in the subject at hand.

The term "winking" could be symbolic, she winks as she whispers her agreement, thereby showing she is not agree with Tom. The term "ferociously" shows the extent to which she holds contempt for her husband and his opinions.

Why had the Sealanders gone to so much trouble to rescue the group in The Chrysalids?

I'm not sure the answer above is correct since the Sealand woman doesn't deem it 'worth it' to go back for the other thought-speakers. No, I believe that they went through so much trouble to advance themselves with Petra. They weren't interested in David or the others; as she says herself, they would never go as far as Waknuk to rescue someone, but it was different in David's case BECAUSE of Petra. Also, when she meets Petra, she says 'It was worth it! At her age and untrained-yet she can throw a thought halfway across the world! She still has alot to learn but we will give her the best teachers and she will eventually be teaching them!' (pg193)



So you see, it wasn't because of the author's military training to 'never leave a man behind'. It was simply because they wanted Petra to advance themselves.



Hope this helps

Describe Nick's meeting with Tom in chapter 9. Why does Nick finally shake Tom's hand toward the end of the meeting?

Nick shakes Tom's hand because Nick realizes there's no way of getting the truth from Tom, and even if there were, Tom is too shallow, unintelligent, and morally corrupt to comprehend his part in the tragedy. Nick could lecture Tom until the end of time - Tom was just ignorant and selfish.



"I couldn't forgive him or like him, but I saw that what he had done was, to him, entirely justified" (157).




"I shook hands with him; it felt silly not to, for I felt suddenly as though I were talking to a child" (158).



Nick just didn't want to waste any more time with this guy.

What is the character of Elizabeth? How might it be explained?

Elizabeth's character is unconventional, that is, she is ahead of her times, of independent thinking, high self-esteem and uninhibited by society, as opposed to all the other women surrounding her.


She is a young woman with wit and beauty (though not as beautiful, apparently, as her sister Jane) who is "at age" to become engaged and married, but would not do so unless she feels comfortable and happy. This was a notion completely unacceptable in her day, and would have put her in a position to become a dependant spinster- her mother's biggest nightmare.


However, as the story develops we see why she is that way: She is a great sister to Jane, and a loving person with set ideals on what love and life should be like. She tolerates with dignity and charm those limits society puts on women, but she candidly dodges or avoids them through intelligence, and avoidance of major drama. She is open and bold enough to talk to a man without blushing, and of giving her opinion of things, even when not asked.  She seems to have an intellect that is superior to everyone else's, and her wit can take down the likes of Lady Katherine, her mother, her father, Darcy, Wickham, and even her sister Jane.


She declared that she was not the best musician, nor the best reader, but she definitely shines at doing her minimum all because Lizzie is way ahead of the game in all sorts. In not so many words, Lizzie is the baseline of the modern society woman.

Discuss at least two characteristics of Romanticism in John Keat's poem "Ode toa Nightingale".

The poet in Ode To A Nightingale  is an escapist .He escapes through imagination .On his way the bower of the bliss wher the nightingale is ...